PLAN IN OUTLINE

Size of the Plan and Pattern of Outlay

A TOTAL outlay of Rs. 24,882 crores is envisaged for the Fourth Plan. Of the aggregate outlay, Rs. 15,902 crores is in respect of the public sector Plan and Rs. 8,980 crores for the private sector. In the public sector Rs. 13,655 crores have been provided for investment and Rs. 2,247 crores for current outlay. The total investment for the creation of productive assets aggregates to Rs. 22,635 crores. Table 1 indicates the distribution of the public and private sector outlays by major heads of development.

3.2. The estimates of development outlays do not include most of the expenditures by local bodies out of their own resources on development schemes. Expenditure on the maintenance of developmental services and institutions established during the earlier Plans as well as the Annual Plan years (1966-69) will be provided for in the normal budgets and does not form part of Plan outlay. Table 2 shows the pattern of investment by the public and private sectors as envisaged in the Fourth Plan compared to the pattern in the Third Plan

PLAN IN OUTLINE 27

3.3 Table 3 compares the proposed public sector outlay in the Fourth Plan with the expenditure in the Third Plan and Annual Plans (1966-69) under each head of development. The total public sector outlay of Rs. 15,902 crores in the Fourth Plan includes Rs. 8090 crores as outlay on Central schemes, Rs. 781 crores for Centrally sponsored schemes, Rs. 6606 crores in the States and Rs. 425 crores in the Union Territories. Compared to the Third Plan, Substantially increased provision has been made in almost all sectors. The more noteworthy increases are in respect of agriculture and allied sectors, power, industry, scientific research, family planning and water supply.

        
        TABLE  3: Public Sector Outays In the Fourth Plan and  Expenditure  in 
        the Third Plan and Annual plans (1966-69)
        
                                                          (Rs. crores)
                                          
sl. head of development third 1966-69*1 fourth no. plan plan
(0) (1) (2) (3) (4)
1 agriculture and allied sectors 1088.9 1166.6 2728.2 2 irrigation and flood control 664.7 457.1 1086.6 3 power 1252.3 1182.2 2447.6 4 village and small industries 240.8 144.1 293.1 5 industry and minerals 1726.3 1575.0 3337.7 6 transport and communications 2111.7 1239.1 3237.3 7 education 588.7 322.4 822.6 8 scientific research 71.6 51.1 140.3 9 health 225.9 140.1 433.5 10 family planning 24.9 75.2 315.0 11 water supply and sanitation 105.7 100.6 407.3 12 housing, urban and regional development 127.6 63.4 237.0 13 welfare of backward classes 99.1 68.5 142.4 14 social welfare 19.4 12.1 41.4 15 labour welfare and craftsmen training 55.8 35.5 39.9 16 other programmes 173.1 123.5 192.3 17 total 8576.5 6756.5 15902.2
1*Subject to final adjustments.

Central Assistance

3.4. The, principles of allocation and the pattern of Central assistance to the State have also undergone a change. Many States had expressed a view that the Central assistance for State Plans should be distributed in accordance, with certain objective criteria. The question was, therefore, placed before the Committee of Chief Ministers of the National Development Council. It was decided that after providing for the requirements of the States of Assam, Nagaland and Jammu and Kashmir, the Central assistance to the remaining States for the Fourth Plan be distributed to the extent of 60 per cent on the basis of their population, 10 per cent on their per capita income if below the national average and 10 per cent on the basis of tax effort in relation to per capita income, and that another 10 per cent be allotted in proportion to the commitments in respect of major continuing irrigation and power projects. The remaining 10 per cent, it was decided, should be distributed among the States so as to assist them in trackling certain special problems, like those relating to metropolitan areas, floods, chronically drought affected areas and tribal areas.

3.5. Hitherto the Plan schemes under different heads of development had their own patterns of assistance and the States could draw their grants or loans accordingly. Outlays under certain heads of development as also on some of the specified schemes were earmarked and could not be diverted to other heads of development or schemes. This involved procedure of estimation. intimation and payment of Central assistance led to a complicated system of accounting and delays in final financial adjustments. Another feature of this system was that comparatively more advanced States. were able to obtain a larger proportion of Central assistance in

28 FOURTH FIVE YEAR PLAN

the form of grant even though the total quantum of assistance from the Centre was less in comparison with the less advanced 'States as they could adopt, in view of their revenue position being comfortable, such schemes as would attract larger amounts of grant. In order to simplify the procedure for release of Central assistance, to avoid adoption of standard schemes unsuited to local conditions and needs as well as to ensure equity among States in regard to the grant assistance for the Plan, it has been decided that in future there will be no schematic patterns of assistance. Central assistance will not be related to any specific schemes or programme under the State Plans but would be give into the States through block grants and block loans. Each State will get a fixed proportion (30%) of Central assistance in the form of grant and the balance (70%) by way of loans. In order to ensure that the overall priorities of the Plan are adhered to, outlays under certain heads of subheads of development and specified schemes will, however, be earmarked and will not be diverted to other heads of development. The distribution of Central assistance to the different States and the total size of their Plans are given in Annexure II. The details of distribution of outlays by each head of development for the Centre and the Centrally sponsored schemes are given in Annexures IV and V.

3.6. States will now have much greater initiative in the formulation of schemes and programmes. Till now the State Plans had been formulated by and large in terms of standard schemes which had been approved by the Central Ministries and the Planning Commission and which carried with them a quantum of assistance in the shape of loans and grants.

3.7. The decision that 60 per cent of the assistance should be distributed on the basis of population and that the States in which per capita incomes were below the national average should get another 10 per cent of the total assistance is a step towards the reduction of regional imbalances.

3.8. The distribution of Central assistance according to the formula accepted by the National Development Council reduces the uncertainties which have till now attended the process of fixing the size of the Five Year and Annual Plans of States. Central assistance being predetermined, the size of the States' Plans will now be dependent largely on the efforts of the individual State to, marshal its own resources for Plan programmes.

Centrally Sponsored Schemes

3.9. Ever since the First Plan, a variety of programmes had been launched through schemes in which uniform patterns of staffing and administrative organisations were laid down by the Centre.

The usually carried with them substantial Central assistance during the Plan period. These were called Centrally sponsored schemes. The responsibility for financing the committed expenditure for these at the end of the Plan fell on the States.

3.10. The States felt that most of the programmes envisaged in, these schemes could be more appropriately carried out by them through their own Plans. The Administrative Reforms Commission had also expressed a similar view in their report on the Machinery for Planning and suggested restriction of the number of Centrally sponsored schemes to the barest minimum and simplification of their operation. It has been decided that in future only those Centrally sponsored schemes will be taken up which fulfil the following criteria :

(a) that they relate to demonstrations. pilot projects, surveys and research;

(b) that they have a regional or inter-State character;

(c) that they require lump sum provision to be made until they could be broken down territorially; and

(d) that they have an overall significance from the all-India angle.

3.11. The position was reviewed in the light of the above considerations and a shorter list of Cenrally sponsored schemes was drawn up and approved by the Committee of the National Development Council in September 1968. The list contained 52 schemes compared to 92 originally included. Subsequently the Planning Commission and the Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Community Development and Cooperation decided that the seven schemes to be administered by ICAR may be classified as purely Central schemes with the result that in the Fourth Five Year Plan 1969-74 the total number of Centrally sponsored schemes is 47. Those schemes will hereafter be wholly financed by the Central Government. The outlay on these schemes is Rs. 781 crores. The Centrally sponsored schemes are mainly under agriculture, health, family planning and welfare of backward classes.

3.12. The distribution of outlay between the Centre, Centrally sponsored schemes, States and Union Territories under major heads of development is shown in table 4. Annexure I gives more detailed information about the expenditure under various heads of development in the Third Plan and Annual Plans (1966-69) and the corresponding outlays in the Fourth Plan :

28(a)

28(b)

PLAN IN OUTLINE 29

3.13. The outlay under agriculture does not fully reflect the anticipated ste up in as much as does not take into account the substantial investment to be financed in this sector by some of the financial institutions, namely, agro-industries corporations, land development banks and central cooperative banks. The investment in agriculture to be financed by these institutions from resources other than Plan outlays would amount to Rs. 950 crores. The Rural Electrification Corporation will make a supporting investment of Rs. 150 crores. The relevant figures are :-

Centre's Plan

3.14. The details of the requirements of Central projects were discussed with the Ministries concerned. Keeping in view the priorities and the essential needs of the economy, certain adjustments in the outlays of the various sectors have been made While considering the programmes to be included in the Plan in the Central sector, an attempt has also been made to identify more clearly and fully the programmes which were being financed through certain Central institutions to which funds were flowing partly from the Central Government resources and partly from banking and other sectors. In

30 FOURTH FIVE YEAR PLAN

particular. mention has to be made, of the resources to be raised by the Food Corporation of India for building up buffer stocks of foodgrains and by term-lending institutions like the Industrial Deve- lopment Bank, the Industrial Finance Corporation, the industrial Credit and Investment Corporation and the Agricultural Refinance Corporation for financing Plan programmes.

State Plans

3.15. In the light of the reassessment of reasouces after the award of the Fifth Finance Commission and special accommodation to States in respect of their non-Plan deficits. the State Plan outlays have now been put at Rs. 6606 crores for the Fourth Plan period. This will be supplemented by an outlay of Rs. 781 crores for Centrally sponsored schemes mainly under agriculture; health, family planning and welfare of backward classes. The Central Plan also includes provision to the extent of Rs. 545 crores by way of support to the State programmes through institutions like Agricultural Refinance Cor- poration, Land Development Banks, Rural Electrification Corporation and Indian Dairy Corporation. Provision has also been made in the Central sector Plan for a few schemes which will directly benefit the States. Among them are the schemes for small farmers and agricultural labourers (Rs. 115 crores), dry farming (Rs. 20 crores) and area development (Rs. 15 crores). Thus a significant proportion of the additional outlay in the Central sector Plan is designed to support the development programmes included in the State Plans and the total Plan expenditure in States (excluding purely Central sector programmes, as for railways, large industries and ports) will be substantially larger than the outlays of State Plans.

        TABLE 6 : State Plan Outlay-by Major Heads of Development
        
                                                               (Rs. crores)
                                          
sl. head of development third annual fourth no. plan plans plan 1960-69*1
(0) (1) (2) (3) (4)
1 agriculture and allied sectors 972 779 1426 2 irrigation and flood control 655 448 1050 3 power 1139 970 1919 4 industry and minerals 203 146 312 5 transport and communications 294 210 483 6 social services 844 456 1324 7 other programmes 58 43 92 8 total 4165 3052 6606
1*Subject to final adjustments.

3.16. The targets aimed at and the results anticipated in selected fields are indicated in table 7 :

31

32 FOURTH FIVE YEAR PLAN

3.17. On the basis of the programme of investments proposed for the Fourth Plan and the Level of outputs expected to be reached in different sectors by 1973-74, it is estimated that the overall rate of growth during the Fourth Plan will be about five and a half per cent a year. Detailed sectoral estimates are presented in Table 8.

        TABLE 8 : Estimates of Net National Product : 1968-69 to 1973-74  
                                           (Rs. crores at 1968-1969-prices)
                                          
sl. item 1968-69 1973-74 no.
(0) (1) (2) (3)
1 agriculture 4250 18212 2 forestry and logging 449 539 3 fishing 165 200 4 sub-total 14864 18951 5 mining and quarrying 317 465 6 large scale manufacturing 2242 3490 7 small scale manufacturing 1559 2011 8 construction 1142 1722 9 electricity, gas and water supply 237 270 10 sub-total 5497 8058 11 transport and communications 1309 1785 12 railways 469 595 13 communications 181 265 14 transport by other means 659 925 15 trade, storage, hotels and restaurant 3105 4357 16 sub-total 4414 6142 17 banking and insurance 440 554 18 real estate and ownership of dwellings 675 797 19 public administration and defence 1308 1444 20 other services 1873 2360 21 Sub-total 4296 5155 22 net domestic product 29071 38306 23 net factor income from aborad (-)270 (-)408 24 net national product at factor 28801 37898 or national income or or 28800 37900

3.18. According to the estimates of the Registrar General, population is expected to grow at the rate of 2.5 per cent per year during the five year period. The increase in per capita income over the Plan period will be about 3 per cent per year. In order to realise the rate of growth postulated, it will be necessary to step up the rate of domestic savings from the level of 8.8 per cent in 1968-69 to 13.2 per cent and that of investment from 11.3 per cent to 14.5 per cent by the end of the Plan. The increase in foodgrains output visualised in the Plan will enable the country to dispense with concessional food imports by 1971. Efforts will be made to limit the growth of non-food imports to 5.5 per cent per year While securing an annual increase of 7 per cent in exports. As a result, the requirements of foreign aid, net of debt repayment and interest payments, in the terminal year of the Plan will be brought down to about half the level in 1968-69. A detailed discussion of the programmes designed to achieve these objectives appears in the succeeding chapters. Table 9 gives a few selected macro-economic pro- jections for the Fourth Plan :

        TABLE 9 : Macro-Economic Projections : 1968-69 and 1973-74
                                          
sl. item unit 1968-69 1973-74 no.
(0) (1) (2) (3) (4)
1 national income Rs. crores 28800 37900 at 1968-69 prices 2 population (mid year-october 1) million 527 596 3 per capita income rupees 546 636 4 domestic savings as percentage of national income per cent 8.8 13.2 5 net investment as percentage of national income per cent 11.3 14.5