SECOND ALL-INDIA EDUCATIONAL SURVEY-OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATION
1. The objectives of the Second All-India Educational Survey are determined by requirements in the field of education and administrative considerations. It has been mentioned in Chapter I that before formulating the objectives and the scope of the present Survey, the views of the State Governments and other agencies were obtained and an attempt was made to assess the needs that must be served by the present Survey.
2. Different needs were stressed by the various State Governments and other agencies. It was considered necessary by many State Governments that the data of the First Survey needed to be revised in order to rationalize the location of schools at the primary, middle and secondary stages. It was also suggested that in addition to the problem of location of schools, the problem of the location of colleges and institutions of higher education should be looked into.
3. According to one suggestion, one of the urgent needs of planners and administrators in education is detailed information about existing conditions in institutions of various types in different areas. Also, baseline data is necessary for the evaluation of future progress. it was, therefore, suggested that an important item in the Second All- India Educational Survey should be the collection of base-line data about various kinds of institutions.
4. Another view stressed the need for the equalization of educational opportunities in different areas. It was pointed out that one of the defects of educational planning was that the planning started from the top rather than from the bottom. Local needs were rarely taken into account in the implementation of development programmes. This had led to wide disparities in the provision of educational facilities at different levels among different districts in every State. Therefore, the main task ahead in the field of education should be to minimize the differences and special efforts should be directed to places where they were most urgently needed. It was suggested that in future, educational development plans should be prepared for every district and that the Survey should provide the basic data necessary for preparation of these plans.
5. Another suggestion emphasized the problems of quality and content of education and the need to relate education to economic development. It was pointed out that in India there were many areas which were developing industrially and that no procedures had been evolved to relate educational programmes to the economic needs in these areas. It was, therefore, suggested that attempts should be made to collect data on the manpower requirements of such areas in the short run (say, for the plan period only), on the quantity and quality of education such areas would need and might demand, and on other aspects where education and economy were related.
6. There were many other suggestions also. Some of these related to the study of instructional programmes and classroom practices, the problems of linguistic minorities and of handicapped children and the schooling facilities available for them. 7. Considering the number of demands made, it was obvious that the scope of the Survey had to be fairly wide. There were, however, other considerations that had to be taken into account while formulating the objectives of the proposed Survey. A survey on an All India basis would obviously require a big machinery with trained personnel in large numbers at various levels, especially at the lowest level, i.e. the district level where the data were to be collected and tabulated. The methodology would include various techniques of collection and analysis of data for which training of the personnel involved was also necessary. But no machinery existed which could be used by such a survey. The
12 SECOND ALL-INDIA EDUCATIONAL SURVEY
administrative machinery that was set up at the time of the First All- India Educational Survey had been dismantled as soon as the Survey was over. Therefore, a fresh beginning had to be made to instal the machinery required for the Second Survey. Taking all these factors into consideration the Advisory Committee for the Second All-India Educational Survey approved the following objectives for the proposed Survey:
(i) To revise the data of the First Educational Survey in terms of the distribution and size of habitations and delimitation of school areas of existing priMary, middle and high schools and to collect data required for the preparation of district development plans for, education.
(ii) To study intensively:
(a) the existing conditions of educational insti- tutions-primary, middle and secondary schools colleges, engineering institutions at the degree and diploma levels, and other institutions (that may be decided later on)-in respect of staff, their qualifications, experience and age, enrolment and wastage, physical facilities in the for of buildings, libraries, laboratories and equip ment etc; (b) some special educational problems such a factors impeding opening of schools in backward areas, drop-outs at primary stage, single teacher schools, etc.
(iii) To conduct studies in a few industrially developing areas on manpower requirements and educational needs and demands and such other matters as pertain to human resource development and educational planning.
8. Even this set of limited objectives could not be taken up simultaneously. It was, therefore, decided that the programme might be phased. Since the problem of location of institutions at the school level and preparation of district development plans was more urgent, this was taken up immediately as the First Phase of the Survey. The other phases were to be undertaken gradually. 9. A detailed statement of the objectives of Phase I of the Survey is given below.
To identify and enumerate
(i) every distinct habitation;
(ii) every primary, middle and secondary school;
(iii) habitations which have in them provision for educational facilities at primary, middle and secondary stages; and
(iv) habitations without educational facilities in them at primary, middle and secondary stages.
To know: (v) in case of every habitation under (iv) above, the distances at which educational facilities at the various stages are available for habitations in different population slabs;
(vi) the distribution of primary, middle and secondary sections and enrolment in these sections according to number of teachers and classes in a section;
(vii) the distribution of primary, middle and secondary sections according to number of teachers and enrolment in each section;
(viii) class-wise enrolment in schools with different sections;
(ix) the distances which children at primary, middle and secondary stages walk from their school-less habitations to the schools in the neighbouring habitations;
(x) distribution of teachers in primary, middle and secondary sections according to their qualifications;
(xi) enrolment in different classes at primary, middle and secondary stages;
(xii) the distribution of untrained teachers according to their age and teaching experience;
(xiii) distribution of schools according to their management and the nature of ownership of school buildings; and
(xiv) the qualifications of teachers teaching science in secondary schools and laboratory facilities available to them for teaching science.
The fulfilment of the above objectives also provides the basic data required for the preparation of educational development plans for the districts.
10. The present report pertains to Phase I of the Second All-India Educational Survey. To avoid the inconvenience of using a longer phrase "Phase I of Second All-India Educational Survey", the phrase "Second All-India Educational Survey" has been used in the present report.
11. The scope of the Survey covers the whole of India. For the reasons explained in Chapter 1, the data for Nagaland, NEFA, and Andaman & Nicobar Islands are not included here and will be given separately. The data for Lahul and Spiti in Punjab have not been in- cluded because these areas were snowbound when data in Punjab were collected. For administrative reasons, the data of Mizo Hills district in Assam could not be collected and are, therefore, not available in this report.
12. At the Centre, the National Council of Educational Research and Training was responsible for planning and supervision. An Educational Survey Unit was established in the Council which was responsible for the
OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATION OF THE SECOND ALL-INDIA EDUCATIONAL SURVEY 13
organization of the Survey. In the States and the Union Territories, the Directors of Public Instruction/ Education functioned as Directors of the Survey with the assistance of their respective Educational Survey Units.
13. At the district level, the Survey was organized either according to educational districts or the administrative districts depending upon the convenience of the individual State Governments. The District Education Officers (Parishad Education Officers or District Inspectors of Schools) were put in charge of the Survey in their respective areas. The data were collected separately in every block under the supervision of District Education Officers who were assisted by their District Survey Officers. There were five forms for collection of data (Appendices III to VII), and the data collected in these forms were tabulated for every block in the block tables (Appendices IX to XLIV). The block tables were consolidated into district tables. With the help of the district tables the State tables were prepared. The all India tables in this report have been prepared with the help of the State tables. Further details regarding organization of the Survey, the tools for collection of data, the tables and the instructions given to the Block Officers for the collection of data have been given in the note at Appendix I.
14. Given below are the definitions of the important concepts and terms and the meanings of the symbols used in this report.
Habitation: A 'habitation' is a distinct cluster of houses with a local name. It is a Centre where people live in a compact and contiguous manner.
Urban Areas: The definition for urban areas used in the 1961 Census has been accepted in the present Educational Survey. According to the 1961 Census definition, all habitations located within the limits of Municipalities, Cantonment Boards, Notified Area Committees and other areas enjoying recognized local administrations, like the Civil Lines, have been regarded as urban areas. Other places satisfying the following three tests have also been treated as urban areas.
(a) Population not to be less than 5,000.
(b) Density of population not to be less than 1,000 per sq. mile.
(c) At least three-fourths of the adult male population should be employed in pursuits other than agriculture.
14 SECOND ALL-INDIA EDUCATIONAL SURVEY
Distance: The distance between two habitations or between a school and a habitation is the convenient walking distance between the central points of the two habitations or the school and the central point of a habitation.