![]() |
||
|
|
||
|
||
| <<BACK |
EDUCATION GUARANTEE SCHEME AND ALTERNATIVE & INNOVATIVE EDUCATION
|
Background : The Current NFE Scheme 1.1
Overview The Centrally Sponsored
Scheme of Non Formal Education (NFE) was introduced in 1979-80 on a pilot
basis with a view to support the formal system in providing education to all
children upto the age of 14 years as enunciated in the Directive Principles
of the Constitution. In
subsequent years, the NFE scheme was expanded to cover 10 educationally
backward states of Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu
& Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, and West
Bengal. The National Policy on
Education (NPE), 1986 recognised that the school could not reach all
children and a large and systematic programme of non formal education would
be required for school dropouts, for children from habitations without
schools, working children and girls who could not attend whole day schools.
Thus NFE became an important component of the overall strategy for
achievement of Universalisation of Elementary Education (UEE). The
NFE scheme was revised in 1987-88. While the focus continued to be on 10
educationally backward states, but it also included urban slums, hilly,
tribal and desert areas and projects for working children in other states
and Union Territories (UTs) as well. A
major portion of the NFE scheme is run by the state governments which set up
NFE centres. One component of this scheme provides grants to Voluntary
Agencies (VAs) directly from the central government for running of NFE
centres and a third is for projects of experimental innovative nature by VAs
. The Programme of Action
(POA) 1992 outlined strategies for strengthening of the NFE scheme
including:
1.2
Current Status of NFE Scheme
1.3 Review and Assessment of the NFE Scheme 1.3.1 Several evaluations and assessments by state
governments, institutions and most notably the Programme Evaluation
Organisation (PEO) of the Planning Commission have indicated that the
implementation of the Scheme has not been satisfactory. The
PEO’s findings were:– Insufficient involvement of the local community,
the Village Education Committees (VECs) and the Panchayati Raj Institutions
(PRIs). The absence of linkages for entry at different
levels into formal schools and for tie-ups with the National Open School. The notion that the alternative system is inferior,
second-rate and second-grade, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Insufficient decentralisation of administrative and
financial powers. Insufficient flexibility.
NFE needs to recognise that different children’s groups have
different educational needs and modify itself accordingly. Lack of success with girls.
The attendance at girls’ centres and the number of women
functionaries in the programme have been noticeably low. Poor coordination of the work of VAs with state
governments. Low overall coverage of the scheme.
It covers less than 10% of the out of school children. Delay in release of funds at all levels. Poor completion rates for the primary level by
children studying NFE centres. Very
low transition rates to the formal system. 1.3.2 The NFE centres function for two hours daily at a
time suitable for learners. But in many states the centres have functioned
in the evening and night to accommodate children who are working during the
day. The NFE Scheme did advocate flexibility in various aspects of running
of the centre but the manner of its implementation resulted in a uniformity
and rigidity almost across the country. Certain states like Andhra Pradesh
and Madhya Pradesh could not implement modified approaches which had been
worked out by them within the existing NFE scheme. A large number of NFE
centres were set up in habitations which had formal schools and therefore
the target of small and scattered SC and ST habitations without schools, did
not receive a high priority. Clearly, in its present
form the NFE Scheme could not ensure quality primary education for out of
school children and the objectives and measures outlined in the NPE and POA
(1992) could not be adequately met.
|
||